I pose this question with "hat in hand" and with as much humility as I can muster in the sincere hope that someone will engage with me on this topic. that do not have any such restrictions, I struggle to understand the benefit to Autodesk in systematically excluding large populations of people on the basis of their academic enrollment status. So I wonder, considering that the Autodesk program that makes its software available to students offers minimal protections against the software being used for commercial purposes (in that it is more or less a "good faith" offering), then why not simply offer the software as "not for commercial use" so that those of us who want to use the software for a near-identical purpose as students, but who are not currently enrolled at an institution, could also benefit from Autodesk's generousity and, more importantly, contribute to Autodesk and to the world in whatever way that we can manage?Ĭonsidering the wide range of open source software projects that I contribute to and, in some small way, improve upon. However, in my own time I do enjoy exploring science, especially medical science, and how my talents could be applicable. I am a self-taught software engineer who does not have a post-secondary education, and I have no plans to obtain one given that my life obligations have far exceeded the level in which such a thing remains practically possible. Up until now, I've never come across anything so profound that I felt genuinely saddened by the concept of "free for students" as being something that excluded me from a program. but I often find myself in this position and have never bothered to ask anyone about it. So, obviously its hard (if not impossible) to call yourself a student without being active at a academic institution.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |